Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi. I'm sitting here reviewing changes to a document to see if I can > last call it. > > As part of a response to AD review comments, one of the references > were changed. This document uses numeric references. Starting at > reference 16, everything was renumbered. That makes the diff a pain. > > For this and many other reasons, I strongly encourage people to avoid > numeric references in their documents.
That makes sense, but I believe the default for the xml2rfc tool is to produce numeric references. Does xml2rfc support symbolic references? If the defaults in xml2rfc is changed to symbolic references, I think we'd see that a lot of documents would adopt the new approach. /Simon _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
