Hi - > From: "Tom.Petch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "ietf" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 10:43 AM > Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-williams-on-channel-binding (On the Use > ofChannel Bindings to Secure Channels) to Proposed Standard ... > Otherwise those who would benefit from it - isms, netconf, syslog, ... ? - > will > not understand what they might do. I appreciate that something of this ilk > has > been around for a while (eg as when Ira McDonald pointed the isms list at > draft-puthenkulam-eap-binding-04.txt) but I think that it got no traction > because of its impenetrability. ...
In the isms WG, we were told that we could not use EAP. http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isms/current/msg00464.html Randy _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
