Brian, <we will specify an api on the O/S the application is running>
Who is "we", geopriv? Guy Caron -----Message d'origine----- De : Brian Rosen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : 25 avril 2007 14:29 À : 'Hallam-Baker, Phillip'; 'John Schnizlein'; 'David W. Hankins' Cc : 'GEOPRIV WG'; ietf@ietf.org Objet : RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums On most devices of interest, this is a non issue; they are small embedded devices, like phones. For other situations, for example a sip softclient running on a laptop, we will specify an api on the O/S the application is running. The api will front end a set of "Location Configuration Protocols" of which DHCP is one. Brian > -----Original Message----- > From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 9:50 AM > To: John Schnizlein; David W. Hankins > Cc: GEOPRIV WG; ietf@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums > > But how does my application access it? > > DHCP is not something that an application layer program should be allowed > to perform. It is a security issue. For good reason performing DHCP > operations requires privileges beyond mere network connectivity on > Windows. > > That is why configuring application programs from DHCP never caught on. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: John Schnizlein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 6:41 PM > > To: David W. Hankins > > Cc: GEOPRIV WG; ietf@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 > > Working Group Hums > > > > The reason that DHCP is appropriate for information about the > > location of the host is that the scope of DHCP administration > > usually does match the local network to which the host is > > attached. Location is local information. > > > > John > > > > On Apr 20, 2007, at 3:38 PM, David W. Hankins wrote: > > > > > The point is that the ISO L(x) is not what one considers > > when judging > > > wether or not a certain configuration value "would make a good band > > > name. I mean DHCP option." > > > > > > What we (strive to) consider instead is the administrative scope of > > > the configuration information, and wether it matches common and > > > practical use of DHCP. > > > > > > On Apr 19, 2007, at 7:47 PM, David W. Hankins wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 03:38:40PM -0700, Hallam-Baker, > > Phillip wrote: > > >> DHCP is a layer 3 technology that talks directly to layer 2. > > > > > > DHCP is a technology that dynamically configures hosts. > > > > > > If a host has a configuration knob that might reasonably > > and properly > > > be set by the systems administrator or the network you are > > presently > > > attached to, then it is reasonable and proper to configure it via > > > DHCP. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ietf mailing list > > Ietf@ietf.org > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Geopriv mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
