> NAT-PT really needs to be wiped off the face of the earth. It provides
> all of the disadvantages of IPv4+NAT with all of the transition costs of
> IPv6. If there is ever any significant penetration of NAT-PT, then the
> pseudo-IPv6 network will not be able to support any more kinds of
> applications than the NATted IPv4 does today.
i tend to agree, but in rfc-index.txt i could not find the change of
state to "Historic". what happend to very similar (and much more evil
IMHO) transition technology, SIIT?
itojun
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
