Section 4.3.2 states: The Answer-Mode and Priv-Answer-Mode header fields have equivalent functions, except that Priv-Answer-Mode requests a higher level of privilege in granting the answering mode specified by the request.
Would it not make sense to have a single header that performs both of these equivalent functions, using a parameter (e.g. 'high' or 'level=high') to distinguish between the two? This might have the following benefits: 1) The document would be smaller. 2) The implementation may be simpler. 3) If the need for more than just two levels of privilege were found in the future then this could be easily extended, rather than following the current pattern of needing another header, e.g. Really-High-Priv-Answer-Mode: 4) 'Priv' might be misinterpreted to mean 'private' rather than 'privilege' by the unfamiliar. > -----Original Message----- > From: The IESG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 10 July 2007 22:44 > To: IETF-Announce > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Sip] Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-answermode (Requesting > Answering Modes for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) to Proposed > Standard > > The IESG has received a request from the Session Initiation Protocol > WG > (sip) to consider the following document: > > - 'Requesting Answering Modes for the Session Initiation Protocol > (SIP) ' > <draft-ietf-sip-answermode-04.txt> as a Proposed Standard > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to > the [email protected] mailing lists by 2007-08-05. Exceptionally, comments > may be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead. In either case, please retain > the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > The file can be obtained via > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-answermode-04.txt > > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=vie > w_id&dTag=14099&rfc_flag=0 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
