At 9:49 AM -0500 7/25/07, Dave Crocker wrote:
>Ted Hardie wrote:
>> A broader solution that encompasses other potential
>>uses of content negotiation seems to me in order.
>
>Other than probably looking for an interaction mechanism, rather than one
>through email, does this have any relationship to:
>
> Content Negotiation for Messaging Services based on Email
> <http://www.apps.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3297.html>?
>
>d/
>--
>
> Dave Crocker
> Brandenburg InternetWorking
> bbiw.net
The SIP preference/capabilities work broadly re-uses the CONNEG framework.
This optimization treats a particular problem with "application" as a top-level
type in the SIP context. Though there are application types in 3297
(application/pdf),
using them in negotiation hits SIP in somewhat different ways. The question is
whether generalizing the subtype content negotiation needed there would be
useful for other content negotiation users.
Ted
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
