On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 05:04:54 -0400
Keith Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> I'm not sure what your point is -- I took Keith's comment to mean
> >> that home NATs with v6 were completely unacceptable.
> >
> >
> > /64's do NOT imply that there's NAT functionality involved, just
> > that there's
> > a single subnet, yes?
> yes, but it's unreasonable to expect a home user to not need to
> subnet. particularly when there are so many different media
> competing for the home network space....it would be reasonable to
> have a subnet for each medium.
>
>
I originally agreed with you on that. However, given modern switches,
I'm not nearly as convinced.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
