On 8/21/07, Keith Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Roger Jørgensen wrote: > > > > I am fully aware of that it will very likely be more than one subnet at some > > point, that is why the last paragraph was included. Anyway, the important > > point is that we probably should have two different type of end-users, big > > and small. > no. the important point is that all users need to initially have enough > address space that they can attach not just multiple networks, but > multiple layers of networks, at that point. trying to define the > difference between the two types of end-users is silly. the reason that > IPv6 has so many bits in its address space is to allow for expansion at > the edges without making addresses variable length.
You missed the point in my mail completly. My only point was that we probably need to split the /48 boundry into two, one for big or those who ask for it, they will all get a /48. And the standard that everyone get if they dont ask for a /48. -- Roger Jorgensen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
