At Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:18:52 -0400, John C Klensin wrote: > Taking this document as an example, it would seem reasonable to > me to say "This has been discussed around the IETF and > elsewhere. While some people agree with it, others do not and > some of the others believe it is premature with regard to both > the developing state of the art and it literature review and > citations. It is the intention of the author that the document > be used to inform the ongoing debate and discussion, not that it > be considered normative or a constraint on future work in the > IETF or in other forums". > > If I am correct that a statement of that type accurately > represents your view and that of others who support the content > of the document, EKR's view, and reality, we would then be > finished.
I consider this to be a fair summary of my view, at least. -Ekr _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
