Cullen Jennings wrote: > > I think a much better design would be one that supported many protocols > and took advantage of the flexibility or URIs instead of just jabber - > for example a header that looked like > > IMPP: xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another approach, naturally, would be to define a header field for including an im: URI and/or one for including a pres: URI. That seems fairly straightforward. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
