> >     /48 PA assignments to the customer is sufficient.
> >     for roaming clients (like travelling laptops with PPP) there's a
> >     different requirement.
> >   
> IMHO even a traveling laptop with PPP needs to be able to subnet.   
> I've lost count of the number of times I've needed to do this in IPv4
> but been stuck with a single /32.  I have also lost count of the number
> of times I've used a laptop as a router in the days when I had a /28
> routed to me.  Built in NAT capability for IPv4 that allows a single PPP
> connection to be shared over wireless seems fairly common these days. 
> We need the equivalent capability in IPv6, just without NAT.

        agreed, like your laptop providing connectivity for your music player
        (like iPod), SIP-ready phone (like Symbian phones) and such.
        the internet infrastructure should keep options open for the other
        industry player to play with.

itojun

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to