> At 11:27 -0700 8/27/07, Ted Hardie wrote:
>
> >After reading the document, I do not believe it has
> >sufficient detail to be advice to IANA.
>
> I agree with that. I've sent details on this privately to the
> editor, WG chair, and IESG secretary as that is mostly a matter of
> mechanics.
>
> >I think even that is an inaccurate reflection of this document.
> >"Should the IETF instruct the IANA to set up this registry?" would
> >be a closer reading, at least in my opinion. My answer to that
> >question is no.
>
> After getting my head up out of the registry operations quicksand I
> am becoming increasingly convinced that setting up a DLV at IANA is
> the wrong step to take.
>
> > The second is that these instructions essentially
> >force the use of at least two DLVs.
>
> That's very convincing to me. Having a second DLV operator doesn't
> benefit the public Internet enough to ask IANA to take on the extra
> role.
>
> And yes, if there is to be DNSSEC anywhere the public Internet root
> zone ought to be signed.
The alternative is to direct IANA to collect, maintain and
distribute this information to the DLV operators in the
absence of a signed root. This would give a trusted path
for data entry into the general DLV trees.
> --
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468
> NeuStar
>
> Think glocally. Act confused.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
