> > http://sa.vix.com/~vixie/ula-global.txt has my thoughts on this, which
> > i've appropriated without permission from hinden, huston, and narten
> > and inaccurately failed to remove their names from (since none of them
> > supports the proposal). in fact, nobody in the ietf intelligensia
> > supports the proposal. the showstopped is that this appears to many as
> > an end-run around PI, and the fear is that there's no way to prevent it
because, in the end, ULA (whichever flavor it is) leads to IPv6-to-IPv6
NAT.
itojun
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
