On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 07:52:25AM +1300, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>
> I think the process has proved to be rather resistant to packing of
> meetings, written statements distributed in the meeting room, and
> back-channel campaigns to have non-participants commenting on drafts
> they haven't read. None of which means we should *ignore* input from
> non-participants, but we should not be ashamed of making a judgement
> of its weight or lack thereof.
>
all of those activites indicate particpation to me.
could you please clarify "non-participant" in the
context of someone making a contribution (pro or con,
independently or in concert with others).
perhaps you have in mind "card-carrying" IETF members
who pay their dues and send their employees to meetings?
--
--bill
Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and
certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise).
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
