*> *> One idea that was floated a couple of years ago, as part of a one-level *> standards track, was to retain the register of implementation reports *> (http://www.ietf.org/IESG/implementation.html) and mark the entries *> that have been approved by the IESG. The RFC index could then point to *> approved implementation reports, without any formal "promotion" needed. *> *> Brian *>
Brian, So, this implementation report registry would be analogous to the current errata registry> E.g., the RFC search engine would note the existence of implementation reports for a particular RFC, just as it now notes the existence of errata? Bob Braden _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
