> > ULA, > > No apparent consensus to do this. But is it needed to deploy > IPv6? A lot of people say absolutely not.
And if, during the next year or so of larger scale deployment of IPv6, we discover that ULA-C is needed, then it can be made available relatively quickly because it doesn't require upgrades to any existing IPv6 devices or software. Don't forget NAT-PT. Deprecated by the IETF because its not a good long-term idea, but it has already been deployed and if people can get some short term use out of it, the IETF only deprecates, it doesn't ban. > In terms of new work, the only thing I'd like to see is that > driven by a clear and compelling need from folk that are > seriously trying to deploy IPv6 and can identify a real gap > in available standards. I don't doubt there is some work to > be done here, but it needs to be driven by a real, concrete > need, not just be yet more "tinkeritus". Spot on! --Michael Dillon _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
