Marshall, >> Another option is that the RFC Editor should be more careful. It >> really isn't that hard for the RFC Editor to run xml2rfc on the XML >> file and wdiff it against the draft that is approved by the IESG, and >> bring noticeable differences to the two parties. > > agreed. at the risk of stating the obvious: the problem is identical > to the one where the authors submit nroff source to the rfc-editor. > > it's always a good idea to run the toolchain, and then diff the text > against the I-D approved by the IESG. if there's a difference, the > relevant ADs and authors need to get on the same page.
And all of this, incidentally, is what the RFC Editor and ADs do... Jari _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
