> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Ned Freed wrote:
> >
> > So keep the MUST for aliases but lose it for lists? I could live with that
> > too but it would probably force a recycle.
> I thought that removing requirements is OK during document progression.
Removing capabilities and features is fine - encouraged even. This is removing
a restriction, which could be seen as adding any number of capabilities. That's
arguably not OK, although the determination is of course up to the IESG.
Ned
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
