Dave Crocker wrote:
>
> Well, that's such a reasonable question, I did a subjective review of
> Proposed Standard RFCs for the last number of years -- ignoring that
> most recent and going back to rougly RFC 2500 -- looking for acronyms
> that were for significant IETF-generated efforts.
> ...
> A number of questions come to mind:
>
> 1. What additions or removals should be made to the list?
add MsgTrk
Tony Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
