On Feb 14, 2008, at 1:24 PM, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote: >> >> >> In essence, something like this would increase the address lenght by >> 16 bits. > > Well, as I am sure you know, the reason NAT is so successful is that > it > basically does extend the IP address space by 16 bits, but in a > backwards compatible way, making it incrementally deployable. Thus, > you > get high utility and ease of deployment, the double whammy that > leads to > success, as draft-iab-protocol-success discusses.
So this thread could be summarized as "32+16 > 128" _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
