Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:I am not advocating "v6 to v6 NATs", as confirmed by some of my earlier messages that argue against. But, if an IPv6-only client has to be able to reach an IPv4-only server, I keep saying that some NATs will have to deal BOTH with IPv6 (client side) and IPv4 (server side). As a matter of fact, your recent I-D on MNAT-PT does propose ways of doing it. With this clarification, I believe we are in agreement. RD |
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
