At Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:04:05 +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > > I just registered for IETF-71 and tried to pay. I wasn't bothered too > much when I got an SSL warning for the former, but I hesitate to > proceed with the latter, which is also under the amsl.com domain. > > My browser (the latest version of Safari on the Mac) complains that > the issuer of the certificate is untrusted. That would be Starfield > Secure Certification Authority. > > Is this a CA in good standing that we should trust?
So, what puzzles me here is: Why is this going to amsl.com at all? It seems extremely desirable to have a set of names and credentials that point only to *ietf.org, both to keep interfaces consistent and to avoid issues with referential integrity in future transitions. -Ekr _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list [email protected] http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
