On Mar 6, 2008, at 7:10 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> Sam Hartman wrote: >>> Making it a BCP will make the interpretation problem worse not >>> better. >> >> >> How? > > To some extent that depends on how carefully the putative BCP > is crafted, with "should" and when to disregard "should" being > very precise.
What does this mean? Is it an argument that as a BCP the "shoulds" carry weight whereas now they can be obeyed more conveniently? Or is it a general comment regarding the futility of formalizing procedures? -andy _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
