Spencer Dawkins wrote: > I have misunderstood before, but one point of view I've heard expressed was > that > > - NomCom is supposed to choose the best candidate, while > > - the confirming body is supposed to make sure NomCom chose a good candidate
That sounds like exactly the opposite of a rational sequence. Nomcom's always do an early filter against clear inadequacy. If that leaves no candidates, they search for more. This is like doing late-stage reviews, after a working group has been operating for two years, and raising strategic concerns about their entire apporach: Good issues, but at the wrong time. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
