Hi Jari, we have already started todo the same with other protocols in GEOPRIV. See http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv/current/msg05453.html http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv/current/msg05468.html http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv/current/msg05472.html
Ciao Hannes Jari Arkko wrote: > I really enjoyed the IPv6 experiment, thanks to everyone who was > involved. Obviously, the experiment and a couple of other recent things > (like moving to AMS service) made things move forward in a number of > different places, our own computers, IETF computers, various people's > own and company sites, etc. Perhaps the most notable achievement here > was ipv6.google.com. That was really great, thank you Google! > > But the experiment was useful also in other ways, not only as an > operational/deployment action. The two experiments that I attended > (NANOG and IETF) have changed my and maybe other people's opinions too > on some of the technical issues. I think it helps us see clearer on what > are the things that the IETF needs to do in this space. We will see > follow-ups on this. > > We should also implement future IPv6 experiments and network deployments. > > But why I'm really sending this e-mail is to suggest that IPv6 might not > be the only topic for such future efforts. Here's a challenge for the > RAI folks: What about SIP, as in every plenary participant making SIP > calls to each other. Doable? > > Challenge for our IT folks: Internationalized Internet Drafts, including > file names. Doable? > > ietf.pana in addition to ietf.1x. Doable? > > Etc > > Jari > > _______________________________________________ > IETF mailing list > IETF@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
