> [...] >> If we learned that the anonymous posting actually came from person was >> affiliated with the IPR holder, then there is legal recourse. My >> point is that by avoiding anonymous posting, the likelihood of such >> abuse is significantly reduced. > > I think the point would be valid if there were significant abuse today. >
I don't know what would qualify as significant here, but there has been at least one rather high profile antitrust case in the recent history (semiconductor industry), in which a situation similar to the one we are discussing has played a role. Stephan > /Simon > _______________________________________________ > IETF mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
