> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:00:23AM +0100, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> > Ned Freed wrote:
> >
> > > If the consensus is that better interoperability can be had
> > > by banning bare AAAA records that's perfectly fine with me.
> >
> > FWIW, I'd like that...
> >
> > >> Clarity can be established and interoperability _improved_
> > >> by limiting discovery to just A and MX records. Perhaps a
> > >> note might be included that at some point in the future MX
> > >> records may become required.
> >
> > > Again, I have no problem with this approach if that's what
> > > the consensus is.
> >
> > ...and that, too.
>
> so what is supposed to happen when I remove all
> "A" RR's from my zones?
The same thing that happens today with zones that don't
have A records. You use MX records to refer to machines
that have address (A and/or AAAA) records.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
