>
>The IESG has received a request from the IP Telephony WG (iptel) to
>consider the following document:
>
>- 'The Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) tel Uniform Resource
> Identifier (URI) Parameter Registry '
> <draft-ietf-iptel-tel-reg-05.txt> as a Proposed Standard
>
>The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
>ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2008-04-15. Exceptionally,
>comments may be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead. In either case, please
>retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
>The file can be obtained via
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-iptel-tel-reg-05.txt
>
>
>IESG discussion can be tracked via
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=14101&rfc_flag=0
>
I support this draft going forward. I believe, in particular, that the choice
of
"Specification Required, Designated Expert" is the best match here. I had a
set of conversations
with Jon and the authors on this over the course of the last couple of
iterations,
and I believe the result will help prevent unregistered parameters in
"closed" environments, give sufficient review to encourage well thought-out
extensions, and generally support interoperability in this space. Like
everything,
it does represent some compromises, but I believe they are the right ones
for this URI parameter registry.
regards,
Ted Hardie
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
