The "atompub" was originally in reference to the Atompub Working Group. Now that the WG is closed, it probably would make sense to change this to just atom. If another version of the draft is needed based on last-call comments, I can make the name change then.
- James Tim Bray wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:03 PM, The IESG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider >> the following document: >> >> - 'Atom Bidirectional Attribute ' >> <draft-snell-atompub-bidi-06.txt> as an Experimental RFC > > The name of this draft is a little misleading. Shouldn't it be > "atom-bidi" not "atompub-bidi"? It doesn't have anything to do with > the protocol, which is what atompub stands for in most people's minds. > -Tim > _______________________________________________ > IETF mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
