I would like to congratulate the editors for the inclusion and content of the Manageability Consideration section. It is well written, and includes detailed information that will be very useful for implementers as well as for operators who will deploy the protocol.
One nit: in section 8.6 s/number of session/number of sessions/ Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The IESG > Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 11:49 PM > To: IETF-Announce > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Last Call: draft-ietf-pce-pcep (Path Computation > Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)) to Proposed Standard > > The IESG has received a request from the Path Computation Element WG > (pce) to consider the following document: > > - 'Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP) ' > <draft-ietf-pce-pcep-12.txt> as a Proposed Standard > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and > solicits final comments on this action. Please send > substantive comments to the [email protected] mailing lists by > 2008-04-30. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > The file can be obtained via > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-12.txt > > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=vie > w_id&dTag=14049&rfc_flag=0 > > _______________________________________________ > IETF-Announce mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
