At 11:37 PM +0200 6/2/08, Frank Ellermann wrote: >If what you propose boils down to "the errata should have a >backlink to the HTML version and/or to the RFC meta data" >it is of course fine, that is one simple global fix to the >errata user interface.
That works for me. >Apparently John's proposal was about the at least 60 days >between the approval of an obsoleting / updating RFC, and >the time when it gets its number. For RFCs blocked by a >MISSREF that could be years or forever. For RFCs killed >by an appeal it is forever, intentionally. The RFC metadata referred to above could be updated at the time a new RFC is approved in its stream, not at the time the RFC itself is published. --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
