Brian Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here's my suggestion: > > List 2606 in the informative references, and footnote the examples used > to indicate > that they are "grandfathered" non-2606 examples. > > So, in text that previously read "not-example.com", it might read > "not-example.com [*]", > with the references section having "[*] Note - non-RFC2606 examples > used. Please read RFC2606." > > Something along those lines, should hopefully be enough to keep both > sides happy, and resolve the DISCUSS, > and hopefully both set a suitable precedent *and* make moot the appeal.
I think this sounds like a good compromise, and it does improve the document quality IMHO. John, would this be an acceptable addition to the document? Thanks, Simon _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
