The headline is pretty misleading. The content seems accurate.
Brian
On 2008-07-29 00:55, Marc Manthey wrote:
> morning all,
>
> i was a bit confused after i read this 2 articles
>
>> NAT gets added to IPv6 after all
>
> http://www.techworld.com/networking/features/index.cfm?featureid=4167&pagtype=all
>
>
>> NATs necessary for IPv6, says IETF chair
>
> http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/072109-nat-housley-qna.html
>
> i am afraid that after 10 Years of NAT that it will survive and itojun
> would turn into his grave.
>
> http://ipv6samurais.com/ipv6samurais/demystified/nat-problem.html
>
> just my 2 cents
>
> greetings
>
> Marc
>
> --
>
> Les enfants teribbles - research and deployment
> Marc Manthey - head of research and innovation
> Hildeboldplatz 1a D - 50672 Köln - Germany
> Tel.:0049-221-3558032
> Mobil:0049-1577-3329231
> jabber :[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> blog : http://www.let.de
> ipv6 http://stattfernsehen.com
> xing : https://www.xing.com/profile/Marc_Manthey
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
