--On Wednesday, August 13, 2008 3:36 PM -0400 Tony Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think it would be better to use phrasing like this:
BCP 32 (currently RFC 2606)
And that, of course, has yet a different meaning, although probably nearly the same one as the "2606 and successors" version does.
john _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
