--On Wednesday, 27 August, 2008 02:32 +0200 Frank Ellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Russ Housley wrote: > >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc97.pdf > > Yes, that was a famous case for friends of RFC 5198 :-) > > I think somebody had a printed copy and scanned it to > fill a gap in the repository at least for PDF. > > Now looking at it again, the last page was apparently > never ASCII. Or it does not really belong to RFC 97. Many of the very early RFCs were prepared in NLS... or on what I believe were called "typewriters" at the time. Neither form is conveniently machine-processable today. john _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
