On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:34:46AM +0200, Magnus Westerlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 122 lines which said:
> > I note with even more interest that reservation of "codepoints" > > for example or other documentation purposes would violate existing > > IESG statements and rules about conservation of scarce resources > > (where scarcity is an issue) or would require negotiation with > > other bodies. > > > > Which IESG statements are you referring to? The rules I'm personally concerned about when reading the proposed IESG statement are: RFC 5236, section 3.3 (which mentions "scarcity") RFC 5237 for an example in a densely populated field _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
