Paul Hoffman wrote: > At 12:37 PM -0500 9/25/08, Stephen Nadas wrote: >> I have read this draft and I support this (imho) very good idea. I don't >> think there were any comments on -00. > > There was a great deal of discussion about this last month when the > first draft was posted. See (currently) > <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/mail11.html> > > In particular, please see my comment at > <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg53066.html>, in > which I make a counter-proposal that makes no changes to the current > Internet Draft format and gives more flexibility in the output.
Yes. I (and I recall others) also supported Paul's simpler approach. IMO draft-rfc-image-files-00 is over complex. Stephen. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
