> Worse, it is possible to read the current text of 2026 as > requiring, especially in the absence of an ISOC newsletter, that > a version of STD1 be published as an RFC before the clock starts > running on the waiting period. I think that would violate > common sense, especially given the interpretation of the second > paragraph of RFC 2026 Section 6.2.4 as requiring a sixty-day > waiting period between IESG action and RFC publication. I > think that interpretation is clearly against the intent of 2026,
as does the editor of 2026 Scott _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
