On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 18:11:07 -0700
Joe Touch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> > On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:48:07 -0700
> > Joe Touch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> The point I'm making is that there seems like there should be a
> >> way to prevent the covert channel without mucking up TCP's
> >> definition of what an endpoint is.
> >
> > I think this belongs elsewhere than either the secdir list or the
> > main IETF list,
>
> Agreed; I propose to take this over to TSVWG. It's more general than
> just TCP...
>
Don't forget to include SAAG...
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
