der Mouse wrote: > [Keith Moore] >>> The fact that [DNSBLs] are widely used is sad, not a justification >>> for standardization. > > True. The justification is not simply that they are widely used; it is > that they are widely used, they are often done wrong, they are of > tremendous value when done right, and of actively negative value when > done wrong.
I agree that this might be a justification for standardizing some sort of reputation protocol. But it's not at all clear the document at hand describes a protocol which is technically sound, and it certainly doesn't have rough IETF consensus. I'm willing to defer judgment about whether such a protocol might reasonably resemble DNSxL, or whether it can reasonably use DNS at all - but I have reason to doubt it. Keith _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
