Tony Finch wrote: > On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Keith Moore wrote: >> Tony Finch wrote: >> >>> In any case, DNSBLs should scale roughly according to the size of the >>> routing table, not the size of the address space. >> What does it mean for a DNSBL to "scale"? > > I was referring to the number of entries that have to be maintained.
okay. I found myself wondering if the change in address space size, and in granularity of assignment, might make DNSBLs less reliable. Which is a different kind of scalability. Keith _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
