David Romerstein wrote: > On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Randy Presuhn wrote: > >> Agreed, but if those analogies are correct, they also undermine the argument. >> Neither the email sender nor the recipient (the ones to whom email is most >> important) typically have any voice whatsoever in the selection of the DNSBL.
> End recipients *absolutely* have a voice in the DNSbl selection process. > They have the option of voting with their feet if their ISP chooses a > DNSbl that negatively impacts them. Or as in the case with a non-ISP (eg: a corporate environment like us), they _are_ the end recipients. The liability for missed email, for example, is entirely the corporation's. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
