On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Scott Brim <[email protected]> wrote:
> John C Klensin allegedly wrote on 1/9/09 11:11 AM: > > > > --On Friday, January 09, 2009 8:36 -0500 Scott Brim > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi Eliot. > >> > >> I agree this is a problem ... but not one that we can solve > >> yet. At this time the face-to-face meetings are still > >> essential, and one cannot evaluate candidates without good > >> knowledge of what an I* member's life is like at them. > > > > Scott, > > > > Part of the reason for the current requirements is exactly what > > I think you are suggesting -- to raise the odds that Nomcom > > members will actually know the candidates and have had the > > opportunity to see them in action in some roles. > > But also that nomcom members have some clue to what the life of an > IAB/IESG member is like. I don't see how you can possibly understand > that without seeing it all in action at a face-to-face meeting. I think any WG chair or shepherd sees a lot of IESG work. Face-to-face meetings can't uncover this work in full.
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
