Since it isn't ABNF, perhaps BBNF?
----- Original Message -----
From: "John C Klensin" <[email protected]>
--On Friday, February 06, 2009 20:59 -0500 Tony Hansen
<[email protected]> wrote:
Going back to RFC 2205,
These rules are specified using Backus-Naur Form (BNF)
augmented with square brackets surrounding optional
sub-sequences.
What do you think of BNFO, for "Backus-Naur Form with Options"?
or BNFB, for "Backus-Naur Form with Brackets"?
Either one would work for me and would be much more descriptive
of what is going on than "Reduced".
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
