> -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Narten [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 6:23 PM > To: Marshall Eubanks > Cc: Contreras, Jorge; Trustees; SM; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed > work-around to thePre-5378 Problem > > > > NEW PROPOSED > > > > > > c. Derivative Works and Publication Limitations. If a > Contributor > > > desires to limit the right to make modifications > and derivative > > > s/desires/needs/ > > > I don't think that "desires" is appropriate here - as John pointed > > out, the contributor has no discretion here, except for their > > judgement as to whether rights are available. > > Actually, in this case, it is the submitters choice, since we are > talking about case (i) or (ii) (and not (iii) which has been the > challenging case). And "desires" is the wording that has been used > here for a while. > > But that said, a more neutral term is fine by me, since the > motivations for needing to select this may vary. > > How about "chooses"? > > Thomas
"chooses" is fine with me _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
