In message <20090211233244.ga23...@localdomain>, Ward Vandewege writes:
> Hi Noel,
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 05:39:19PM -0500, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> > Thank you for being part of a crowd of hundreds of people who have mailbomb
> ed
> > the mailboxes of thousands of IETF 'members' (since we don't have any forma
> l
> > membership, just an email list). As a result, we all have such positive
> > feeling about the FSF.
>
> I appreciate that's a problem. However, maybe that's a sign that perhaps next
> time the IETF shouldn't *ask* for comments to be sent to the mailing list?
>
> The IESG is considering approving this draft as a standards track
> RFC. The IESG solicits final comments on whether the IETF community has
> consensus to publish draft-housley-tls-authz-extns as a proposed
> standard. Comments can be sent to ietf at ietf.org or exceptionally to
> iesg at ietf.org. Comments should be sent by 2009-02-11.
>
> That's from
>
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg05617.html
>
> We all did exactly as you asked. If that caused problems, please consider
> creating a separate mechanism for comments next time. But don't blame people
> for following your guidelines. That's just silly.
>
> Thanks,
> Ward.
>
> --
> JHV Consulting USA
> Colocation, dedicated and virtual servers, hosting
> http://jhvc.com
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
The message was sent to the "IETF community" for comment.
It wasn't sent to the public for comment. It didn't request
comments from the public.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
