> Ray and Trustees,
> Please note that this is exactly the sort of issue that I
> believed we had a commitment to have sorted out and in the hands
> of the tool maintainers by the 15th (or earlier). It doesn't
> depend on the specific text to by used, so could, and IMO
> should, have been worked through in parallel with, or in advance
> of, any considerations of text.
> While getting things working is more important in the short term
> than understanding what happened here, I believe that the fact
> that fairly explicit commitments were made and then the ball was
> dropped is something that should be visible to the community and
> that calls for a review of the IASA's way of doing business.
+1
Ned
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
