my error here - Paul said DNS does no ordering... he did not specify ordering of what. we now return you to your rant.
--bill On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 07:54:37PM +0000, Chris Thompson wrote: > On Mar 4 2009, OndEej SurC= wrote: > > >On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:57 PM, <bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com> wrote: > [...] > >> DNSSEC does reorder RRSets within a zone. Which is a new feature. > > > >When we started talking about order of RRSets? This is purely discussion > >about order of RRs in RRSet. Order of RRSets in zone is irrelevant before > >DNSSEC and also after DNSSEC. Nothing depends on order of RRSets > >at least in my best knowledge. > > I took Bill to mean "DNSSEC does reorder RRs within an RRset" anyway, as > I don't know in what other sense DNSSEC is relevant at all. > > But the canonical ordering of RRs within an RRset for signing purposes > says nothing about the presentation order in the answers to DNS queries. > And in fact a certain well-known nameserver implementation not unassociated > with Paul still supports all the rrset-order and sortlist controls, which > work for secured zones as well as unsecured ones. > > -- > Chris Thompson > Email: c...@cam.ac.uk > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
