On Apr 16, 2009, at 2:29 AM, Tom.Petch wrote:
I am surprised not to have seen more formal reviews of the quartet
for isms I-Ds
whose Last Call has just finished, updating as they do a Standard,
while at the
same time introducing a Transport subsystem and model, and also
introducing a
new (to snmp) way of providing Security.
I do not know what or how these reviews are triggered but I would
have expected
a good deal more than this one and the one that appeared as I was
drafting this
response, a round dozen even.
Gen-art reviews are assigned to a team of volunteers (i.e. the general
area review team.) I'm not sure about the assignment criteria, but I
_think_ we try to catch most, if not every, draft being IETF last
called for publication.
Tom Petch
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben Campbell" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; "General Area
Review Team"
<[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 10:05 PM
Subject: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isms-transport-security-
model-12
<snip>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
