On March 9, 2009 Alan DeKok wrote...
> Security Section:
>
> There are good reasons to provision USM access so supplement with
> AAA-based access, however.
>
>
> NIT: This doesn't appear to be a sentence.
Yeah. Let's see what that was supposed to say... I think it's:
There are good reasons to provision USM access to supplement
AAA-based access, however.
ISMS decided to handle this late WG Last Call comment as IETF Last Call
input, so I'm re-posting the message now.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
